
Liquidity pools and impermanent loss: a worked 50/50 example
Compare a simple liquidity position with holding the same assets, then separate trading fees, price divergence, and concentrated-liquidity risks.
DeFihi Lab / Learning path
2 connected guides to help you ask more precise questions.
Yield explanations need units, a time period, a reward source, and an exit. Without these, two percentages can appear comparable while describing different activities. This tag collects the mathematical and operational questions that should accompany a quoted reward rate.
Read the staking article to distinguish APR from APY and understand what compounding assumes. Then work through the liquidity-pool example to compare a pool position with a hold-only baseline. Both articles separate token amounts from their reference-currency value and explain where a simplified model stops representing a real position.
Use the worked examples as tools for checking assumptions, not as forecasts. Actual outcomes can depend on reward changes, price movements, costs, permissions, liquidity, and protocol-specific withdrawal rules. A calculation can be arithmetically correct while answering the wrong question. State the baseline and exclusions before drawing a conclusion from a rate or a pool-value comparison.
For the wider context, return to the complete DeFihi Lab library or explore the DeFi Staking topic hub.

Compare a simple liquidity position with holding the same assets, then separate trading fees, price divergence, and concentrated-liquidity risks.

Separate network staking from lending and incentives, compare APR with APY, and include token price, fees, and withdrawal conditions.